Lecture 3 - the proprietary approach to IP

Disclaimer

Today's lecture will focus on the proprietary, WIPO understanding of the intellectual property concept. The critical analysis of the model as well as discussion of alternative models will follow in following lectures.

Intro

As discussed earlier, there are two quite different schools in dealing with copyright and related issues - the Continental European and Anglo-American school. Estonia is generally considered to belong into the Continental European school (although some features point towards the other school too). The Continental European school is based on Roman Law and inherits its understanding of two major legal categories:

Intellectual property is considered to be a part of private law.

To describe the relation between the subjects, there are two concepts of

The WIPO concept of intellectual property

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) was formed in Stockholm in 1967 (this may be considered the starting point of international proprietary copyright sphere). WIPO defines intellectual property as any result of human intellectual activity. Examples include

The idea of IP is twofold:

Although IP is in essence a right, it has many features of physical property - it can be rented, bought, sold or given away, but also stolen. The major specific features of IP are:

Main categories of IP

The main categories are

Patents, trademarks, and designs rights are sometimes collectively known as industrial property, as they are typically created and used for industrial or commercial purposes.

Copyright vs industrial property

The main differences are as follows:

More about industrial property

Patent

The word originates from Latin patens (public) and reflects the original idea to make useful discoveries and inventions public by protecting them, rather than letting the creators keep them secret. Patents can be applied for

A good definition for invention - "a new way to create something old, or vice versa".

Examples of things which cannot be patented:

Patenting criteria are as follows:

The exclusive rights conferred by intellectual property laws can generally be transferred (with or without consideration), licensed (or rented), or mortgaged to third parties. In case a patent is not used by the owner, any interested party can apply for a forced license in a court of law.

Trademark

Can be

Three last ones cannot be protected in Estonia!

Trade secret

A piece of confindential information that

Works as a mouse trap (the first mouse gets killed, the next will eat the cheese). Are only protected until:

Industrial design

Covers the outer design of an object. To be protected as one, it must

Cannot be used when the form of the object is technically derived from its use (e.g. the shape of a rocket), can be used for e.g. the shape, material or colour of a keyboard (a concrete example: MS Natural Keyboard).

Competition law

Also considered a part of industrial property legislation already since 1883. Outlaws activities which are not in accordance with fair business practices and generally accepted manners. Includes

Final words

While the current WIPO system developed a relatively working integrity during the second half of the 20th century and many parts of it are still fully applicable, the emergence of Internet and subsequent birth of the whole new ecosystem has proposed increasing challenges to it. These topics will be covered in future lectures (as well as licensing which may be done in various ways).



tagasi Akadeemia esilehele

1995-2012, Kaido Kikkas

Käesoleva dokumendi paljundamine, edasiandmine ja/või muutmine on sätestatud kas GNU Vaba Dokumentatsiooni Litsentsi versiooni 1.2 või uuemaga (Litsentsi ingliskeelne täistekst) või Creative Commonsi Autorile viitamine + Jagamine samadel tingimustel 3.0 Eesti litsentsiga

GNU FDL Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 Estonia

1995-2012, by Kaido Kikkas. This document is distributed under either GNU Free Documentation License (v1.2 or newer) or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Estonia license.